<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: With Maurice Morris banged up and Shaun Alexander not 100%, what are the Seahawks to do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesportsmaster8000.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/with-maurice-morris-banged-up-and-shaun-alexander-not-100-what-are-the-seahawks-to-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesportsmaster8000.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/with-maurice-morris-banged-up-and-shaun-alexander-not-100-what-are-the-seahawks-to-do/</link>
	<description>The happiest place on Earth!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sports Junkie</title>
		<link>http://thesportsmaster8000.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/with-maurice-morris-banged-up-and-shaun-alexander-not-100-what-are-the-seahawks-to-do/#comment-4052</link>
		<dc:creator>Sports Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsmaster8000.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/with-maurice-morris-banged-up-and-shaun-alexander-not-100-what-are-the-seahawks-to-do/#comment-4052</guid>
		<description>Not a big Seahawks fan, but have always thought Alexander to be over-rated!  They definetly need to play the rookie.  It wouldn&#039;t matter if Alexander was a 80% or if he was 100%! he isn&#039;t his &quot;former self&quot;.  But as I said I never looked at him like an eilte back.  Sure he scored a lot of TDs and broke the record in &#039;05.  Sure he can grind out yards and chew up clock.  But those were the days when the Seahawks were good.  That was when they had their ridiculous offensive line.  I&#039;m not trying to take anything away from him.  He&#039;s good, but not what he&#039;s hyped up to be.  His MVP season he had he got a TON of TDs handed to him.  Hasselbeck had a GREAT year that year, and pretty much set up Alexander with his MVP.  Hasselbeck: 3,459 yards, 24 TDs (should have been more), only 9 INTs, with a 65% completion percentage.  I think Alexander may have had 1 or 2 long runs.  Anyways, start the rookie and hope Alexander can come back next year ready to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a big Seahawks fan, but have always thought Alexander to be over-rated!  They definetly need to play the rookie.  It wouldn&#8217;t matter if Alexander was a 80% or if he was 100%! he isn&#8217;t his &#8220;former self&#8221;.  But as I said I never looked at him like an eilte back.  Sure he scored a lot of TDs and broke the record in &#8216;05.  Sure he can grind out yards and chew up clock.  But those were the days when the Seahawks were good.  That was when they had their ridiculous offensive line.  I&#8217;m not trying to take anything away from him.  He&#8217;s good, but not what he&#8217;s hyped up to be.  His MVP season he had he got a TON of TDs handed to him.  Hasselbeck had a GREAT year that year, and pretty much set up Alexander with his MVP.  Hasselbeck: 3,459 yards, 24 TDs (should have been more), only 9 INTs, with a 65% completion percentage.  I think Alexander may have had 1 or 2 long runs.  Anyways, start the rookie and hope Alexander can come back next year ready to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
